CityScroll

Back to the guide

Understand · Explanation

Flags and historical patterns

What the computed notes on a record are, what they are not, and where the exact rule behind each one is written down.

What does this flag mean, and how far can I trust it?

Last reviewed 2026-09-06

A flag means "worth a closer look"

Some records carry computed notes beside what the city published — most of them on procurement notices, and one on the rules timeline. Every one of them is statistical context, not a finding and not an accusation. A flag says a record has a property worth noticing. It does not say anyone did anything wrong, and there is a fair explanation for each of them — emergencies really do happen, some markets genuinely have few bidders, and name matching is never perfect.

The method follows two published guides rather than a house theory of what looks suspicious: the Open Contracting Partnership's red-flags guide and Opentender's integrity indicators.

What each note counts

The exact thresholds, pools and windows behind these live on the About page, in Flags and context, explained. They are kept in one place on purpose: a threshold repeated in two places is a threshold that will eventually disagree with itself. This is what each note is about.

The noteWhat it looks atWhat it cannot tell you
Short ad windowHow long a notice was open compared with that agency's own usual practiceWhether the timing was justified. A short window can be entirely proper
Non-competitive methodThat the notice itself says a vendor will be chosen without a full contestWhether that method was the right one. Several of these are lawful and routine
Repeat awardsThe same vendor name appearing on several award notices at one agency in a periodWhether they are separate decisions. Orders under one blanket contract count the same as anything else
Context stripHow large an award is against that agency's recent awards, and the vendor's share of themAnything about merit. It uses published names exactly, and does not merge spellings
Rules adoption lagHow long comparable rules have taken from comments closing to adoptionWhen this rule will be adopted. It is labelled an estimate and is never a date

All of these read awards as published. Published award figures can run ahead of contract registration and well ahead of what was actually paid, so a note built on them is describing publications, not spending.

Patterns from past records

Elsewhere on the site, past public records are used to give a sense of how long something has taken before. These are descriptions of what has already happened, not forecasts, and legal deadlines always take precedence over them.

The patternWhat it describesWhere its rule is written
Civil-service eligible-list timingHow long a list has taken to be established after filing closed, from past examsEligible-list timing
Property sale timingHow long auctions have followed past hearing noticesProperty sale timing
Tax lien sale progressionHow often liens at the same stage reached a past cycle's final sale listTax lien progression
Zoning case historyThe usual time range and results for comparable past zoning casesWhat past zoning cases show
Applicant historyAn applicant's own past zoning results beside the overall rateApplicant history

Each of these carries its own honesty conditions, and the pages say so where they apply: the eligible list comparison uses no applicant names, scores or ranks; a real sale date always replaces the property timing pattern; a lien can leave a list for many ordinary reasons, including simply being paid; and where a group is too small or the evidence too weak, the site shows a wider group or nothing rather than a confident-looking number built on very little.

How to read one honestly

If you want the full arithmetic rather than the meaning, the formulas are published: the rules adoption lag, property disposition timing, award registration dwell, and applicant-conditioned zoning outcomes.

Sources used in this article

Browse contracts and awards