انگریزی ماخذ: Back to the guide
یہ ترجمہ مشین کے ذریعے تیار کیا گیا ہے اور ابھی تک کسی مقامی بولنے والے نے اس کا جائزہ نہیں لیا۔
انگریزی ماخذ: Understand · انگریزی ماخذ: Explanation
انگریزی ماخذ: How records are connected
انگریزی ماخذ: What CityScroll means when it links two records, how to inspect that claim, and why some obvious relationships stay unlinked.
انگریزی ماخذ: What a connection claims
انگریزی ماخذ: CityScroll connects records the city publishes separately — a notice to the agency that issued it, an agency to a vendor it awarded work to, a rule to the duty behind it. Every one of those connections is a claim, and every claim has a basis you can read.
انگریزی ماخذ: The claim is always narrow. It says these two published records refer to the same thing, and here is what made that identification. It never says one record caused the other, and it never says anyone did anything wrong.
انگریزی ماخذ: How the identification was made
انگریزی ماخذ: Open یہ تعلق کیسے قائم ہوا on a connected record and you get the basis rather than a score. The labels distinguish three kinds of evidence.
| انگریزی ماخذ: Basis | انگریزی ماخذ: What it means | انگریزی ماخذ: How much weight it carries |
|---|---|---|
| شائع شدہ ریکارڈ کے ذریعے مطابقت | انگریزی ماخذ: The two records carry the same identifier the publisher issued — a procurement identifier, an agency code, a project number | انگریزی ماخذ: The strongest kind. The city's own key did the joining |
| ریکارڈ کے باہمی ربط سے مطابقت | انگریزی ماخذ: The records were matched on their content, such as an organization's name, rather than on a shared identifier | انگریزی ماخذ: Weaker. Names are written inconsistently, and different organizations share names |
| انسانی جائزے کے بعد قبول شدہ | انگریزی ماخذ: Someone reviewed the pair and accepted it | انگریزی ماخذ: As good as the review, which is why it is labelled rather than hidden |
انگریزی ماخذ: The same panel names the relation itself — "issued rule", for instance — and links the official source the records came from. If a connection matters to you, that link is the thing to open.
انگریزی ماخذ: The connection has an address
انگریزی ماخذ: A connection you have opened stays in the address of the page. Copy the address and you can send someone the record with that specific claim already inspected, rather than telling them where to click. It is the same habit as keeping the address of a search: the link carries the state.
انگریزی ماخذ: Why an obvious relationship can be missing
انگریزی ماخذ: A connection that plainly exists in the world can still be absent here, and none of these reasons means the relationship is not real.
- انگریزی ماخذ: No shared identifier was published. Two records can describe the same contract without either one carrying a key the other has. There is then nothing exact to join on.
- انگریزی ماخذ: The name is written differently. A vendor filed as one spelling on a notice and another on a payment record may not resolve to one organization.
- انگریزی ماخذ: The city has not published the joining record. Some links exist only inside an agency's own systems, or are released in a form that cannot be joined.
- انگریزی ماخذ: The match was not good enough to show. A connection that could not be classified is left off the page rather than shown wrapped in hedges. An absent connection is not a denial that the relationship exists.
انگریزی ماخذ: What a connection is not
انگریزی ماخذ: A connection is not a finding. Two records being linked is not evidence that money moved improperly, that an official acted wrongly, or that a decision was made because of the other record. A named awardee on a contract does not mean that vendor is currently open to subcontractors, and a vendor appearing beside an agency repeatedly is a count, not a conclusion.